Public actors in new spaces: A case study of digital Malaysia in transnational public deliberation

  • Sara Chinnasamy Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • Ingrid Volkmer University of Melbourne, Australia
Keywords: alternative news, case study, civil society, digital media, direct democracy, gatekeeping, Malaysia, news portals, political communication, public sphere, social media

Abstract

This article examines the role of new transnational public actors and their influence on public deliberation processes in Malaysia. Malaysia is one of the world’s most social media-connected countries where online platforms greatly influence the Malaysian public sphere. Our study suggests considering digital news portals as specific ‘public actors’ since they enable new political debates in an otherwise fragile national public sphere. While national media are controlled by the state, digital news portals offer not only an alternative news perspective but are a stage for a diversity of voices. Furthermore, they link the Malaysian civic discourse to transnational political debates, such as human rights and ethnic interests. Results from eight in-depth semi-structured interviews with news journalists and editors of traditional media and independent digital news portals provide insights into their perceptions concerning the implications of digital news portals for new aspects of public discourse in Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Sara Chinnasamy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

An Associate Professor at the Faculty of Communication and Media Studies, University of Technology Mara, Malaysia since 2004. Obtained PhD in New Media & Politics from the University of Adelaide, Australia and Post-Doctoral Research Fellow from Media & Communication, University of Melbourne. Currently, one of the founding members of Global Risk Journalism Hub.

Ingrid Volkmer, University of Melbourne, Australia

Professor of Digital Communication and Globalisation, School of Culture and Communication , Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne. Director and Founder of Global Risk Journalism Hub. Her field of expertise is globalized digital communication and International digital policy. Her publications include The Global Public Sphere. Public Communication in the Age of Reflective Interdependence (Polity, 2014) and ‘The transnationalization of public spheres and public policy’, The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration (eds Stone, Diane and Moloney, Kim), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019

References

Abadi, A.M. (2015). Between ASEAN demos and ASEAN kratos: The genesis of ASEAN public spheres. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategy, 42(2), 1-22.

Abbott, J. (2011). Cacophony or empowerment? Analysing the impact of new information communication technologies and new social media in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(4), 3–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000401

Abd Malek, M. K. M. (2018). Colonialism and the dialectics of Islamic reform in a Malay state: Pengasoh and the making of a Muslim public sphere in Kelantan, 1915-1925. University of Cambridge.

Alvarez, S. E. (2014). Beyond civil society: reflections from the feminist field. Cadernos Pagu, 43, 13-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-8333201400430013

Arugay, A. A. (2019). Fall from grace, descent from power? Civil society after Philippine democracy’s lost decade. In I. Deinla and B. Dressel (Eds.), From Aquino II to Duterte (2010-2018): Change, continuity, and rupture (pp. 285-308). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814843294-016

ASEAN. (2017, August 6). ASEAN statistical report on millennium development goals 2017. http://www.aseanstats.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ASEAN_MDG_2017.pdf

Bennett, L. (2013). The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752

Chaudhury, S. (2021). Dispossession, un-freedom, precarity: Negotiating citizenship laws in postcolonial South Asia. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(1), 209-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8795866

Chinnasamy, S. (2013). A study of the impact of the internet, Malaysiakini.com and democratizing forces on the Malaysian general election. The University of Adelaide, Australia.

Chinnasamy, S. (2017). New media political participation and engagement in Malaysia. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628998

Chinnasamy, S. (2018, February 28). A Facebook election. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2018/02/339743/facebook-election-year.

Chinnasamy, S., & Anida, M. T. (2019). New media and social influencer engagement on lifestyle and political content. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3), 3526-3541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5274.098319

Chinnasamy, S., & Manaf, N.F. (2018). Social media as political hatred mode in Malaysia’s 2018 general election. SHS Web of Conferences, 53, 02005. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1fa8/acc5700eaf5d739b8664a0354273b1f8904f.pdf?_ga=2.261097679.318882825.1660265931-389994173.1660265931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185302005

Croucher, S. M., & Cronn-Mills, D. (2015). Understanding communication research methods. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203495735

Digital in Asia. (2018, October 17). Latest digital in 2018 global report. https://digitalinasia.com/2018/01/31/latest-digital-in-2018-global-report.

Dirlik, A. (2012). Colonialism, revolution, development a historical perspective on citizenship in political struggles in Eastern Asia. In C. Kyung-Soup & B. Turner (Eds.), Contested citizenship in East Asia (pp. 43-61). Routledge.

Douglas, M. (2008). Civil society for itself and in the public sphere: Comparative research on globalization, cities, and civic space in Pacific Asia. In M. Douglass, K. C. Ho, & G. L. Ooi (Eds.), Globalization, the city, and civil society in Pacific Asia: The social production of civic spaces (pp. 27–49). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939383

Fink, C. (2018). Dangerous speech, anti-Muslim violence, and Facebook in Myanmar. Journal of International Affairs, 71(1.5), 43-52.

Fraser, N. (2007a). Identity, exclusion, and critique: A response to four critics. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 305–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077319

Fraser, N. (2007b). Transnationalizing the Public Sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7), 7–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080090

Frère, M., & Kyindou, A. (2009). Democratic process, civic consciousness and the internet in Francophone Africa. In O.F. Mudhai, W. Tettey and F. Banda (Eds.), African media and the digital public sphere (pp. 73–88). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621756_5

Gilson, J. (2013). Communicating practice in transnational advocacy: Examples from Southeast Asia. Globalizations, 10, 571-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.806742

Habermas, J. (1999). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. The MIT Press.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage Publications.

Jayal, N. (2013). Citizenship and its discontents. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067585

Koo, J.W. (2007). The origins of the public sphere and civil society. Social Science History, 31(3), 381- 409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200013791

Leong, C. (2020). Digital organising of a global social movement: From connective to collective action. Information and Organization, 30(4), 280-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100324

Leong, P. P. Y. (2015). Political communication in Malaysia: A study on the use of new media in politics. JeDEM—EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 7(1), 46-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v7i1.372

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Luckmann, T. (1996). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.

MCMC. (2018, January 25). Internet users survey 2017. Malaysia. http://www.mcmc.gov.my/skmmgovmy/media/General/pdf/MCMC-Internet-Users-Survey-2017.pdf.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984a). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage Publications.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984b). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020

Milosevic, T. (2017). Blurring the lines: Market-driven and democracy-driven freedom of expression. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 35(2), 167-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2017.1318630

Nain, Z., & Kim, W.L. (2004). Ownership, control, and the Malaysian media. Southbound.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education.

Nielsen. (2019, October 16). Insight understanding Malaysia's Gen Z…and how to reach them (cited in The ASEAN Post Team, Are Malaysian teens aware of fake news? The ASEAN Post, 2021. https://theaseanpost.com/article/are-malaysian-teens-aware-fake-news

Osman, M. (2017). Understanding Islamophobia in Asia: The cases of Myanmar and Malaysia. Islamophobia Studies, 4(1), 18–35.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications.

Postill, J. (2008). Localizing the internet beyond communities and networks. New Media & Society, 10, 413–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089416

Salahudin, A.N., Hasse, J., Zuly, Q. J., & Paryanto. (2020). Islamic political polarization on social media during the 2019 presidential election in Indonesia. Asian Affairs, 51(3), 656-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2020.1812929

Saud, M., & Margono, H. (2021). Indonesia’s rise in digital democracy and youth’s political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 18. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1900019

Saud, M., Ida, R., Abbas, A., Ashfaq, A., & Ahmad, A. (2020). The social media and digitalization of political participation in youths: An Indonesian perspective. Society, 8(1), 83-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v8i1.160

Saunders, B., Sim, J., & Kingstone, T. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Shah, M.H. (2007). Historicising rationality: The transmission of rationality and science to the Malay states under British rule. Asian Journal of Social Science, 35, 216-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853107X203441

Sinpeng, A., & Tapsell, R. (2020). From grassroots activism to disinformation: Social media in Southeast Asia. Iseas-Yusof Ishak Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814951036

Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2018). Manipulation des zivilgesellschaftlichen Raums: Cybertrolle in Thailand und den Philippinen. German Institute for Global and Area Studies.

Steiner, Kerstin. (2018). Malaysia at the crossroads? The never-ending discourse between Islam, law and politics, Journal of Religious and Political Practice, 4(3), 256-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2018.1525896

Tapsell, R. (2018). The smartphone as the ‘weapon of the weak’: Assessing the role of communication technologies in Malaysia’s regime change. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 9-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700302

Tapsell, R. (2021). Social media and elections in Southeast Asia: The emergence of subversive underground campaigning. Asian Studies Review, 26(2), 117-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1841093

The-Titsar, M. (2021). Empowering or endangering minorities? Facebook, language, and identity in Myanmar. Asian Ethnicity, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2021.1951596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2021.1951596

Thompson, M. R. (1993). The limits of democratisation in ASEAN. Third World Quarterly, 14(3), 469–484. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3992482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599308420338

Volkmer, I. (2014). The global public sphere: Public communication in the age of reflective interdependence. Polity.

Wang R., Zhou A. (2021). Hashtag activism and connective action: A case study of #HongKongPoliceBrutality. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101600

Weiss, M. (2013). Parsing the power of ‘new media’ in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 591–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.759332

Yue, A., Nekmat, E., & Beta, A.R. (2019). Digital literacy through digital citizenship: Online civic participation and public opinion evaluation of youth minorities in Southeast Asia. Media and Communication, 7(2), 100-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1899

Yusop, F., & Sumari, M. (2013). The use of social media technologies among Malaysian youth. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1204-1209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.448

PJR icon
Published
31-07-2023
How to Cite
Chinnasamy, S., & Volkmer, I. (2023). Public actors in new spaces: A case study of digital Malaysia in transnational public deliberation. Pacific Journalism Review : Te Koakoa, 29(1 & 2), 136-152. https://doi.org/10.24135/pjr.v29i1and2.1231