Te Whare Rangahau (The House of Research): Designing a methodological framework for an artistic inquiry into Māori gender, identity and performance.
This article considers the methodological framework constructed for the doctoral thesis Takatāpui Beyond Marginalisation: Exploring Māori Gender, Identity and Performance. In this practice-led artistic inquiry the researcher adopted a critically iterative approach where “research questions were initially exploratory and reflective, serving to create an internal dialogue between the practitioner and the making” (Tavares & Ings, 2018, p. 20). The formative question underpinning the thesis asked:
How might an artistic reconsideration of gender role differentiation give a unique voice to takatāpui tāne identity?1
The research sought to illuminate an experiential context, then generate visual and performance artifacts where the principle of irarere within gender identity and sexual orientation, might find a purposeful place to stand within te ao Māori (the Māori world view).2
Emanating from a Kaupapa Māori paradigm the study employed the methodological metaphor of Te Whare Rangahau, a research space that is populated with methods including karakia (incantation), kanohi ki te kanohi (face to face) interviewing, iterative experimentation, pakiwaitara (poetic inquiry), photography, and choreography. In the thesis, Te Whare Rangahau integrated a number of features from Robert Pouwhare’s (2020) Pūrākau framework for practice-led, artistic inquiry - specifically his observation that in much artistic Māori research, through mahi (practice) and heuristic inquiry, the researcher may draw sustenance from both the realm of Te Kura Huna (what is unseen, genealogical, esoteric or tacit), and Te Kura Tūrama – (what is explicit and seen). Within Māori epistemology, a dynamic of mahi (practice) draws nutrients from these realms, synthesising and connecting elements in the generation of print based and performative artistic outcomes.
Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.) (2007) Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry. London, England: I.B. Taurus.
Bishop, R. (2005). Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A kaupapa Māori approach to creating knowledge. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 109–138).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bolt, B. (2007). The magic is in the handling. In Barret, E. And Bolt, B. (2007), Practice As Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London, UK: I. B. Tauris.
Carroll, K. L. (1997). Researching paradigm in art education. In S. D. La Pierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds., Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp.171-192)> Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Douglass, B. G., & Moustakas, C. (1985). Heuristic inquiry the internal search to know. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(3), 39-55.
Gannon, E. (2022). Mindfulness and drawing: A visual poetic inquiry into the representation of mindful drawing experiences. [Doctoral thesis, Auckland University of Technology.]
Griffiths, M. (2010). Research and the self. In: Biggs, M. and Karlsson, H. (eds) Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts (pp. 167-185). Routledge.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Sage.
Holmes, K. (2014). Synthesis: A poetic exploration of the integral model investigating the interconnected strands of mindfulness in our educational landscapes. In Education, 20(2), 121–134.
Ings, W. (2011). Managing heuristics as a method of inquiry in autobiographical graphic design theses. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), 226–241.
Ings, W. (2015). The authored voice: Emerging approaches to exegesis design in creative practice PhDs. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(12), 1277-1290.
Irarere (2021). Te Aka: Online Māori Dictionary. https://maoridictionary.co.nz/search?idiom=&phrase=&proverb=&loan=&histLoanWords=&keywords=irarere
Kleining, G. & Witt, H. (2000). The qualitative heuristic approach: A methodology for discovery in psychology and the social sciences. Rediscovering the method of introspection as an example. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1123/2495
Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16, 1–11.
Mead, H. M. (2003). Tikanga Māori: Living by Māori values. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia.
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Najafi, H. (2023). Displacement of Self-Continuity: An illuminative, heuristic inquiry into identity transition in an animated short film. Doctoral Thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ. http://hdl.handle.net/10292/15784
Pihama, L., Cram, F., & Walker, S. (2002). Creating methodological space: A literature review of Kaupapa Maori research. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 26(1). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fiona-Cram/publication/234647374_Creating_Methodological_Space_A_Literature_Review_of_Kaupapa_Maori_Research/links/5c354a6692851c22a366072d/Creating-Methodological-Space-A-Literature-Review-of-Kaupapa-Maori-Research.pdf
Pouwhare, R. (2020). Ngā Pūrākau mō Māui: mai te patuero, te pakokitanga me te whakapēpē ki te kōrero pono, ki te whaihua whaitake, mē ngā honotanga. The Māui Narratives: From Bowdlerisation, Dislocation and Infantilisation to Veracity, Relevance and Connection. [Doctoral thesis, Auckland University of Technology]. Tuwhera, http://hdl.handle.net/10292/13307
Prendergast, M. (2006). Found poetry as literature review: Research poems on audience and performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284601
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Royal, T. A. C. (2012, June). Towards a manifesto for Indigenous development. [Keynote presentation]. Indigenous Development Research Conference, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Scrivener, S. (2002). Characterising creative-production doctoral projects in art and design. International journal of design sciences and technology, 10(2), 25-44.
Smith, L.T. (1999) Decolonising Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, Zed Books, New York, and Otago University Press, Dunedin.
Smith, L. T. (2000). Kaupapa Maori research. In Battiste, M. (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision Toronto. Toronto, BC: UBC Press.
Szto, P., Furman, R., & Langer, C. (2005). Poetry and photography. Sage, 4(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325005052390
Tavares, T. & Ings, W. (2018). Navigating artistic inquiry in a creative-production thesis: the narrative and illustrative potentials of realismo maravilhoso. Journal of Art, Design and Technology [DAT], 3(2), 9-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333073607_Transitando_pela_investigacao_artistica_em_uma_tese_de_producao_criativa
Tīwhanawhana Trust (2017). Takatāpui – A resource hub. https:// takatapui.nz/definition-of-takatapui#takatapui-meaning
Toluta’u, T. K. (2015). Veitalatala: Mātanga ‘Oe Talanoa [Unpublished doctoral thesis, Auckland University of Technology]. Tuwhera, http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/ handle/10292/8671
Ventling, D. (2018). Heuristics – A framework to clarify practice-led research. Journal of Design, Art and Technology [DAT], 3(2), pp. 122-156.
Walsh-Tapiata, W. (n.d.). Understanding rangahau. https://www.twoa.ac.nz/hononga-stay-co
Ware, F. J. R. (2009). Youth development: Māui styles Kia tipu te rito o te pā harakeke; tikanga and āhuatanga as a basis for a positive Maori youth development approach. (Doctoral thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand). Retrieved from https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10179/1152/02_whole.pdf
Wood, J. (2004). The culture of academic rigor: does design research really need it? The Design Journal, 3(1), pp. 44–57
Copyright (c) 2023 Tangaroa Paora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. By publishing in LINK PRAXIS Journal, the author(s) agree to the dissemination of their work through the LINK PRAXIS Journal.
By publishing in LINK PRAXIS Journal, the authors grant the Journal a Creative Commons nonexclusive worldwide license (CC-BY 4.0): Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License) for electronic dissemination of the article via the Internet, and, a nonexclusive right
to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit, and distribute the content of the journal. The authors grant the Journal the right to transfer content (without changing it), to any medium or format necessary for the purpose of preservation.
Authors agree that the Journal will not be liable for any damages, costs, or losses whatsoever arising in any circumstances from its services, including damages arising from the breakdown of technology and difficulties with access.