Student and supervisor perspectives on engaging in collaborative thesis supervision as an online group

  • Tiffany Williams Te Rito Maioha
  • Debbie Ryder Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand
  • Mae Befayed Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand
  • Ranjani Lata
  • Shelley Auld Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand
Keywords: Master's thesis development, Online group supervision, Social Learning, Reflexivity

Abstract

In this text we relfect on an online group supervision within a Master of Education postgraduate programme. Foregrounding the importance of reflexivity (Ortlipp, 2008) four students and their supervisor retrospectively critiqued the online group supervision process they were involved in. Data was collected by each member of the group individually answering six open ended prompts. A reflexive analysis then occurred when the group met and engaged in further candid conversation. From the analysis, the findings showed that the online group supervision process was viewed as a successful practice for the supervisor to share relevant information across the group in a timely and efficient manner. It was also found that the group process provided opportunity for the growth of student expertise as they shared their thesis development amongst their peers in the group. In doing so, a research community began to develop. Whilst the strengths of the group approach to supervision were acknowledged, both the supervisor and students believed that the group supervision approach must also allow for the provision of individual meetings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carter, M., & Curtis, D. (2010). The visionary director: A handbook for dreaming, organizing and improving your centre (2nd ed.). Redleaf Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. (8th Edition). Routledge.

Löfström, E., Tikkanen, L. Anttila, H., & Pyhältö, K. (2024). Supervisors’ experiences of doctoral supervision in times of change. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 1(15), 34-48.

Ministry of Education – Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga. (2009). Te Aho Arataki Marau mō te Ako i Te Reo Māori - Kura Auraki: Curriculum Guidelines for Teaching and Learning Te Reo Māori in English-medium Schools Years 1-13. Learning Media.

Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695-705. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/8

Vaughan, S., Blackburn, C., & Curzon, R. (2021). Continuing conversations: moving support for doctoral supervisors’ professional development online. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 6(58), 716-726.

Wenger-Trayner, E., Wenger-Trayner, B., Reid, P., & Bruderlein, C., (2023). Communities of Practice. Social Learning Lab.

Wisker, G., McGinn, M.K., Bengtsen, S., Lokhtina, I., He, F., Corner, S., Leshem, S., Inouye, K. & Löfström, E. (2021). Remote doctoral supervision experiences: challenges and affordances. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 6(58), 612-623.

Published
2024-12-18
How to Cite
Williams, T., Ryder, D., Befayed, M., Lata, R., & Auld, S. (2024). Student and supervisor perspectives on engaging in collaborative thesis supervision as an online group. Teachers’ Work, 21(2), 164-169. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v21i2.639