Risky Choices – Autonomy and Surveillance in Secondary English Classrooms

  • Claudia Rozas Gómes University of Auckland


Achievement data from New Zealand secondary schools suggest that students from lower socio-economic communities have fewer opportunities to engage with complex content in subject English. This article examines this phenomenon by drawing on Foucault’s notion of governmentality and considers how a context of simultaneously increased autonomy and surveillance may shape curriculum and assessment choices. To explore these ideas, I use interview data from ten secondary English teachers in the wider Auckland region. I complement Foucault’s (1982) explanation of governmentality with Ball, Maguire, and Braun’s (2012) notion of policy enactment to explore spaces of both compliance and resistance.


Download data is not yet available.


Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Rethinking value-added models in education: Critical perspectives on tests and assessment-based accountability. Routledge.

Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523

Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in sociology. Routledge.

Ball, S. (1993). Education policy, power relations and teachers' work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 106-121.

Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Open University Press.

Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065

Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203153185

Besley, T. (2007). Foucault, truth-telling and technologies of the self: Confessional practices of the self and schools. In M. Peters & T. Besley, (Eds.), Why Foucault?: New directions in educational research (pp. 55- 70). Peter Lang.

Biesta, G. (2004). Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory, 54(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-2004.2004.00017.x

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555

Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionals. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213-229.

Connell, R. (2015). Markets all around: Defending education in a neoliberal time. In H. Proctor, P. Brownlee & P. Freebody (Eds.), Controversies in education: Policy implications of research in education (Vol. 3, pp. 181- 197). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08759-7_16

Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751

Doherty, R. (2007). Critically framing education policy: Foucault, discourse and governmentality. In M. Peters & T. Besley, (Eds.), Why Foucault?: New directions in educational research (pp. 193-204). Peter Lang.

Dymoke, S. (2012). Poetry is an unfamiliar text: Locating poetry in secondary English classrooms in New Zealand and England during a period of curriculum change. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 19(4), 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2012.736741

Education Review Office. (2019). NCEA observational studies. https://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/NCEA-Observational- Studies3.pdf

Fimyar, O. (2008). Using governmentality as a conceptual tool in education policy research. Educate, 1(1), 3-18. http://www.educatejournal.org/index.php/educate/article/view/143/157 Foucault, M. (1979). On governmentality. Ideology & Consciousness, 6, 5-22.

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.

Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2017). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636

Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869956

Lauder, H., Young, M., Daniels, H., Balarin, M., & Lowe, J. (Eds.) (2012). Educating for the knowledge economy? Critical perspectives. Routledge.

Locke, T. (2008). English in a surveillance regime: Tightening the noose in New Zealand. Changing English, 15(3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13586840802364210

Ministry of Education. (2013). New Zealand schools, nga kura o Aotearoa: A report on the compulsory schools sector in New Zealand 2013. http://thehub.swa.govt.nz/assets/documents/40709_Nga_Kura_o_Aot earoa_New_Zealand_Schools_2013_0.pdf

New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (2018). Annual Report on NCEA and New Zealand Scholarship Data and Statistics. https://www.nzqa.govt.nz/assets/About- us/Publications/statsreports/ncea-annual-report-2018.pdf

OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en.

Olssen, M., Codd, J. & O'Neill, A. (2004). Education policy: Globalization, citizenship and democracy. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221501

Ormond, B. M. (2017). Curriculum decisions- The challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(5), 599-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1149225

Ormond, B. M. (2018). The impact of standards-based assessment on knowledge for history education in New Zealand. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(2), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1432564

Perryman, J., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker – School league tables and English and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.578568

Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. S. (2003). Introduction: Foucault today. In P. Rabinow, & N. S. Rose, The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984. (pp. vii-xxxv). The New Press. (Original work published 1994).

Robertson, S. L. (2016). The global governance of teachers’ work. In K. Mundy,

A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 275-290). Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch15

Thrupp, M. (1995). The school mix effect: the history of an enduring problem in educational research, policy and practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, (16)2, 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569950160204

Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the social limits of reform. Open University Press.

Thrupp, M. (2007). Education's 'inconvenient truth': Persistent middle class advantage. Waikato Journal of Education, 13, 253-272. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/6194

Thrupp, M. (2014). Deficit thinking and the politics of blame. In V. Carpenter & S. Osborne (Eds.), Twelve thousand hours: Education and poverty in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 88-101). Dunmore Publishing Ltd.

Thrupp, M., & Lupton, R. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: The social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(3), 308-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00348.x

Weber, E. (2007). Globalization, “glocal” development, and teachers’ work: A research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 279-309. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303946

Whitty, G. (2010). Revisiting school knowledge: Some sociological perspectives on new school curricula. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 28-45.

Wilson, A., Madjar, I., & McNaughton, S. (2016). Opportunity to learn about disciplinary literacy in senior secondary English classrooms in New Zealand. The Curriculum Journal, 27(2), 204-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1134339

How to Cite
Rozas Gómes, C. (2023). Risky Choices – Autonomy and Surveillance in Secondary English Classrooms. Teachers’ Work, 20(2), 368-382. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v20i2.615