Learner Agency, Dispositionality and the New Zealand Curriculum Key Competencies.
Abstract
As more than just knowledge and skills, The New Zealand Curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2007) key competencies encompass dispositions for lifelong learning (OECD, 2005). A range of studies associate learner agency within the dispositions that are embedded in these key competencies (Carr, 2004; Hipkins, 2010; Hipkins & Boyd, 2011). Drawn from self-determination theory (OECD, 2009; Ryan & Deci, 2000), the competencies are strongly anchored in an essentialist frame-work. Interpreted this way, competencies can be likened to a virtual backpack that students carry about and draw from at will. A discursively constituted view of identity would suggest that this is not the case. Employing Davies’ (2010) conception of a subject-of-thought, where the subject is under erasure, the paper explores what agency as dispositionality can look like when it is performatively constituted in a competence-oriented curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2007). Rather being attributed static, essentialised identities, students are co-constituted in classroom discourses. The research has implications for how educators recognise moments when students agentically mobilise personal, social and discursive resources (Davies, 1990) in the classroom. This article presents an argument for a dynamic theory of agency that incorporates a rhizomatic view of learner participation and interrupts essentialist interpretations of dispositionality. It opens up possibilities for new conceptions of key competencies as performative discursive practices.
Downloads
References
Alvermann, D. (2000). Researching libraries, literacies and lives: A rhizoanalysis. In E. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins. Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp.114-129). New York, NY: Routledge.
Anderson, K. (2009). Applying positioning theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macro-kinds, and ideologies of knowing. Linguistics and Education, 20, 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.08.001
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of meaning. Durham, United Kingdom: Duke University Press.
Charteris, J. (2013). Learner agency: A dynamic element of the New Zealand key competencies. Teachers and Curriculum Journal, 13, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v13i0.7
Davies, B. (1990). Agency as a form of discursive practice: A classroom scene observed. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 341-361.
Davies, B. (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler's analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 425-438. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036154
Davies, B. (2009). Deleuze and the arts of teaching and research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(5), 625-630.
Davies, B. (2010). The implications for qualitative research methodology of the struggle between the individualised subject of phenomenology and the emergent multiplicities of the poststructuralist subject: the problem of agency. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 54- 68. www.rerm.hio.no/index.php/rerm/article/download/10/8
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 44-63. Retrieved from http://www.massey.ac.nz/~ALock/position/position.htm
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Drewery, W. (2005). Why we should watch what we say: Position calls, everyday speech and the production of relational subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 15(3), 305-324. doi: 10.1177/0959354305053217
Glogowski, S. (2013). Thinkpiece: The key competencies: Do we value the same outcomes and how would we know? Teachers and Curriculum, 13, 64- 65.
Hamilton, R., Farruggia, S., Peterson, E., & Carne, S. (2013). Key competencies in secondary schools: An examination of the factors associated with successful implementation. Teachers and Curriculum, 13, 17- 55.
Hipkins, R. (2006). The nature of key competencies. A background paper.
Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Hipkins, R. (2009). Determining meaning for key competencies via assessment practices. Assessment Matters, 1, 4–19.
Hipkins, R. (2010, October). More complex than skills: Rethinking the relationship between key competencies and curriculum content. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education and Development of Civic Competencies, Seoul. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/more-complex-than-skills_0.pdf
Hipkins, R., & Boyd, S. (2011). The recursive elaboration of key competencies as agents of curriculum change. Curriculum Matters, 7, 70-86.
Honan, E., & Sellers, M. (2006, November). So how does it work? – Rhizomatic methodologies. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/hon06003.pdf.
Mayes, E., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2013). Ricoprire posizioni alternative: Student voice, riflessione e riforma [Performing alternative positions: Student voice, reflection and reform]. In V. Grion and A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), Student Voice. Prospettive Internazionale e Pratiche Emergenti in Italia [IStudent Voice. International Perspectives and Emergent Practices in Italy]. (pp. 193–211), Milan, Italy: Guerini.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Government Printer.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). The definition and selection of Key Competencies: Executive summary. Paris. Retrieved from www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009). PISA 2009. Assessment framework key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Retreived from www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Government Printer.
Ministry of Education. (2010). National Standards and key competencies. Retrieved from http://keycompetencies.tki.org.nz/National-Standards- and-KCs
Somerville, M. (2007). Postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 225-243.
Vassallo, S. (2013). Critical pedagogy and neoliberalism: Concerns with teaching self-regulated learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(6), 563- 580.
Wallin, J. (2010). A Deleuzian Approach to Curriculum. Essays on a Pedagogical Life. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan
Copyright (c) 2023 Jennifer Charteris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.