Education's 'Inconvenient Truth'

Part Two – The Middle Classes Have Too Many Friends in Education

  • Martin Thrupp University of Waikato

Abstract

This is the second part of an article about how schooling, long geared to the concerns and interests of the middle classes, remains so, and is becoming increasingly so in some ways. In Part One, published in the last issue, I drew a parallel with Al Gore’s well-known film about climate change to argue for middle class advantage as education’s ‘inconvenient truth’. This is because while it is now pretty clear that education policies of recent decades have benefited the middle classes rather than the poor, there is at various points public, practitioner and policy denial of the problem. This denial reflects the self-interest of the middle classes and those who serve them. I focussed in Part One on the likely advantages provided by predominantly middle class school settings and how the middle classes have long targeted such schools for their children. This problem continues: indeed Part One showed how the New Zealand middle classes have been able to secure and in some ways improve their access to schools with a predominantly middle class mix under the zoning policies introduced in 2000. In this second part of the article I explore the problem of middle class advantage from another angle and look at how those who work in the education sector in key roles help to perpetuate middle class advantage in education. It seems the middle class have too many friends in education, which of course is another way of saying that not enough educators are really defending the interests of the poor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball, S.J. (2006). The micro-economics of education reform and the creativedestruction of public sector modernisation. Keynote address to the TaiwanAssociation for the Sociology of Education.

Becker, H. J. (1952). The career of the Chicago public school teacher. Journalof Sociology, 27, 470-77.

Gilbert, J. (2005). Educational issues for communities affected by transience and residential mobility. Report on Phase 1 (2003–2004). Wellington:NZCER.

Grace, G. (2004). Urban education and the culture of contentment: the politics,culture and economics of inner-city schooling, in N. Stromquist (Ed.) Education in urban areas: Cross-national dimensions. Westport: Praeger.

Grunwell, R. (2007). House prices force pupils to go private. Sunday StarTimes. February 4, 1.

Hatcher, R. (1998). Labour, official school improvement and equality. Journal of Education Policy, 13 (4), 485-499.

Lauder, H., Hughes, D., Watson S., Waslander, S., Thrupp, M., Strathdee, R.,Simiyu, I., Dupuis, A., McGlinn, J. & Hamlin, J. (1999). Trading in Futures: Why Markets in Education Don't Work. Buckingham: Open University Press.

McCaig, C. (2000). New Labour and education, education, education, in M.Smith, & S. Ludlum (Eds.) New Labour in government (pp. 184-201).Basingstoke: MacMillan.

Richardson, A. (2006). School Wars. New Zealand Listener, February 4,16-20.

Ritchie, G. (2004). Quantifying the effects of teacher movements between schools in New Zealand: to schools that hath, shall be given. Journal of Education Policy, 19(1), 57-79.

Slee, R. & Weiner, G. (1998). Introduction: school effectiveness for whom? In R.Slee, S. Tomlinson with G. Weiner (Eds.) School effectiveness for whom? (pp.1-9). London & Bristol, PA: Falmer.

Thrupp, M & Lupton, R. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: the social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54 (3),308-328.

Thrupp, M. & Willmott, R. (2003). Education management in managerialist times: Beyond the textual apologists. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Trevett, C. (2006). Upset parents insist they’re not zone cheats. New Zealand Herald, August 18.

Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education.Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Woullfe, C. (2006). Dawn visits flush out cheats. New Zealand Herald,September 24.

Published
2023-06-30
How to Cite
Thrupp, M. (2023). Education’s ’Inconvenient Truth’: Part Two – The Middle Classes Have Too Many Friends in Education. Teachers’ Work, 20(1), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v20i1.441
Section
Editors' Choice