Learners and Outcomes: Where Did All the Children Go?

  • Keith Ballard University of Otago


Ideas about the nature and purpose of education shape the language that is used to talk about teaching. This influences teaching practice. Research on education policy shows a significant move in New Zealand toward the idea that education is a commodity to be traded in the market place. In this context a language of learners and of outcomes emphasises a production output role for teachers over wider concerns for children and their wellbeing. This paper considers the origins of market ideas and suggests that commercialising education has implications for how teachers relate to children.


Download data is not yet available.


Barker, A. (1995). Standards-based assessment: The vision and broader factors. In R. Peddie & B. Tuck (Eds.). Setting the standards: The assessment of competence in national qualifications (pp.15-31). Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.

Child Poverty Action Group (2003). Our children: The priority for policy (2nd Ed.). Auckland: Child Poverty Action Group.

Codd, J. A. (1993). Managerialism, market liberalism and the move to selfmanaging schools in New Zealand. In J.

Smyth (Ed.), A socially critical view of the self-managing school (pp.153-170). London: The Falmer Press.

Dale, R., & Ozga, J. (1993). Two hemispheres – both New Right? 1980s education reform in New Zealand, England and Wales. In B. Lingard, J. Knight & P. Porter (Eds.). Schooling reform in hard times (pp. 63-87). London: The Falmer Press.

Frank, T. (2002). One market under god: Extreme capitalism, market populism, and the end of economic democracy. London: Vintage.

Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale.

Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press.

Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare to teach. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Gallego, M. A., Hollingsworth, S., & Whitenack, D. A. (2001). Relational knowing in the reform of educational culture. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 240-266.

Grace, G. (1988). Education: Commodity or public good? Wellington: Victoria University Press.

Harker, R. (2000). The impact of de-zoning on New Zealand secondary schools. Paper presented to the New Zealand Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, University of Waikato, 2 December.

House, E. R. (1998). Schools for sale: Why free market policies won’t improve america’s schools and what will. New York: Teachers College Press.

Knight, J., Lingard, B., & Porter, P. (1993). Restructuring schooling towards the 1990s. In B. Lingard, J. Knight & P. Porter (Eds.). Schooling reform in hard times (pp.2-22). London: The Falmer Press.

Lauder, H., Hughes, D., & Watson, S. (1999). The introduction of educational markets in New Zealand: Questions and consequences. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 86-98.

Lingard, B. (2001). Some lessons for educational researchers: Repositioning research in education and education in research. Australian Educational Researcher, 28(3), 1-46.

Little, M. (1995). Health, education, and the virtues of efficiency. New Zealand Dental Journal, 91, 89-93.

Luke, A., Nakata, M., Singh, M. G., & Smith, R. (1993). Policy and the politics of representation: Torres Strait Islanders and Aborigines at the margins. In

B. Lingard, J. Knight & P. Porter (Eds.). Schooling reform in hard times

(pp.139-152). London: Falmer Press.

Mallard, T. (2003). Education priorities for New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in education. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Marshall, J. (1995). Skills, information and quality for the autonomous chooser. In M. Olssen & K. Morris Matthews (Eds.). Education, democracy and reform (pp.44-59). Auckland: NZARE.

Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Olssen, M. (2001). The neo-liberal appropriation of tertiary education policy in New Zealand: Accountability, research and academic freedom. New Zealand Association for Research in Education State of the Art Monograph No. 8. Palmerston North: NZARE.

QA News (2001). Brochure introduces NCEA. QA News, June, Issue 38, 6-9.

Ramsey, P. D. K. (1993). Picot-vision and reality in New Zealand schools: An insider’s view. In B. Lingard, J. Knight &

P. Porter (Eds.). Schooling reform in hard times (pp.261-283). London: The Falmer Press.

Robertson, S. L. (1996). Teachers’ work, restructuring and postfordism: Constructing the new ‘professionalism’. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds), Teachers’ professional lives (pp.28-55). London: Falmer Press.

Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.

Smyth, J. (2002). Critical politics of teachers’ work: An Australian perspective.

New York: Peter Lang.

The Treasury (1987). Government management: Brief to the incoming government, Volumes 1 & 2. Wellington: Government Printer

Thrupp, M. (1998). The caring role of schools: Teachers’ and children’s perspectives. Paper presented to the Children’s Issues Centre national seminar on children’s wellbeing at school, University of Otago, Dunedin, 1- 2 December.

van Manen, M. (1999). The language of pedagogy and primacy of student experience. In J. Loughran (Ed.). Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp.13-27). London: Falmer Press.

Wells, A. S., Slayton, J., & Scott, J. (2002). Defining democracy in the neoliberal age: Charter school reform and educational consumption. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 337-361.

Wylie, C. (1999). Is the land of the flightless bird the home of the voucherless voucher? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39(1), 99-109.

How to Cite
Ballard, K. (2023). Learners and Outcomes: Where Did All the Children Go?. Teachers’ Work, 20(1), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v20i1.437
Editors' Choice