Creative STEM Pathways - Supporting Pacific Learners through 3D Printing
Supporting Pacific Learners through 3D Printing
Abstract
The low participation of Pacific students in tertiary STEM studies has implications for schools as they consider how best to engage these learners in STEM subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics). This article reports on an innovative project that supports Pacific learners with STEM learning through 3D printing technology. Creative STEM Pathways is a university-led initiative which has successfully brought 3D technology to the classroom, providing culturally-sustaining, hands-on and relevant learning opportunities. We used an Appreciative Inquiry lens to help us explore how the programme could create positive learning experiences. In this article, we share experiences of its development and delivery. We highlight successes and challenges, offering practical insight to those considering similar innovation in the classroom.
Downloads
References
Amir, N., & Subramaniam, R. (2012). Fostering Inquiry in Science among Kinaesthetic Learners through Design and Technology. In L. Lennex, & K. Nettleton (Ed.), Cases on Inquiry through Instructional Technology in Math and Science 221-257. IGI Global. https://doi-org.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/10.4018/978-1-4666-0068-3.ch009
Blanchard, M., Gutierrez, K., Habig, B., Gupta, P., & Adams. J. (2020). Informal stem program learning. In C.C. Johnson, M.J. Mohr-Schroeder, T.J. Moore, & L.D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on stem education 138 -151. Taylor & Francis Group.
FergusonB., Gorinski, R., Wendt Samu, T., & Mara, D. (2008). Literature review on the experiences of Pasifika learners in the classroom. Report to the Ministry of Education.
Bushe, G. (2007). Appreciative inquiry is not about the positive. OD Practitioner, 39(4), 33-38.
Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2000). A positive revolution in change: Appreciative Inquiry. In D. Cooperrider, D. Whitney, & T. F. Yaeger (Eds.), Appreciative Inquiry: Rethinking human organization toward a positive theory of change. Stipes Publishing.
Coxon, S., Dohrman, R. L., & Nadler, D. R. (2018). Children Using Robotics for Engineering, Science, Technology, and Math (CREST-M): The Development and Evaluation of an Engaging Math Curriculum. Roeper Review, 40(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434711
Dematteo, D., & Reeves, S. (2011). A critical examination of the role of appreciative inquiry within an interprofessional education initiative. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(3), 203-208.
Duncanson, M., Oben, G., Wicken, A., Richardson, G., Adams, J., & Pierson, M. (2018). Child Poverty Monitor 2018: Technical Report (National Report). New Zealand Child and Youth Epidemiology Service. http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8697
Fonua, S. (2018). Embedding indigenous science knowledge and values in higher education: Critical reflexive practice informed by successful Tongan science learners. Waikato Journal of Education, 23(1), 95– 106. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v23i1.629
Grant, S., & Humphries, M. (2006). Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry Bridging an apparent paradox. Action Research, 4(4), 401-418.
Harlow, D.B., Hansen, A., Nation, J., Skinner, R., Pulgar. J., Spina, A., McLean, M., Barriault, C., & Prud’homme-Généreux, A. (2020). Creating STEM learning opportunities through partnerships. In C.C. Johnson, M.J. Mohr-Schroeder, T.J. Moore, & L.D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education 152 - 165. Routledge.
Hipkins, R., Tolbert, S., Cowie, B., Waiti, P. (2022). Enduring competencies for designing science learning pathways. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Hunter, R., & Hunter, J. (2018). Opening the Space for all Students to Engage in Mathematical Practices Within Collaborative Inquiry and Argumentation. In Mathematical Discourse that Breaks Barriers and Creates Space for Marginalized Learners. Brill | Sense. https://doi-org.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/10.1163/9789463512121_001
Goldsmith, D. W. (2018). Beyond Hands On: Incorporating Kinesthic Learning in an Undergraduate Paleontology Class.Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681544
Grieten, S., Lambrechts, F., Bouwen, R., Huybrechts, J., Fry, R., & Cooperrider, D. (2018). Inquiring into Appreciative Inquiry: A Conversation with David Cooperrider and Ronald Fry. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616688087
Jong, C., Priddie, C., Roberts, T., & Museus, S. D., (2020). Race-related factors in stem: A Review of Research on Educational Experiences and Outcomes for Racial and Ethnic Minorities. In C.C. Johnson, M.J. Mohr-Schroeder, T.J. Moore, & L.D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education 278 – 288. Routledge.
Leenen-Young, M. (2020). Pasifika students and learning to learn at university. MAI Journal (Online), 9(1), 70–80.
Meador, A. (2018). Examining Recruitment and Retention Factors for Minority STEM Majors Through a Stereotype Threat Lens: Minority STEM Major. School Science and Mathematics, 118(1-2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12260
Ministry of Education (2019). Best Practice for Teaching Pacific Learners – Pacific Evidence Brief 2019. Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education (2020). Pasifika Education Plan 2013 – 2017. Ministry of Education.
Richardson, L., Clark, Z., Miller, S., Phillips, H., Richardson, K., Tarr, A., & Whānau, T. R. Ā. (2017). Te Rōpū Āwhina: A Model for Building Post-Secondary Māori and Pacific STEM Capability in Aotearoa/New Zealand. STEM and Social Justice: Teaching and Learning in Diverse Settings: A Global Perspective,29–52. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56297-1_3
Rimoni, F., & Averill, R., (2019). Respect: A value vital for Pasifika learners. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2019(3), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0146
Riwai-Couch, M., Bull, A., & Nicholls, J. (2020). Puna kōrero : learning from the parents of Māori and Pasifika students. Set: Research Information for Teachers (Wellington), 2020(1), 58–65.
Shin, J.E.L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12371
Stavros, J. M., Stavros, J., & Torres, C. (2021). Conversations worth having: Using appreciative inquiry to fuel productive and meaningful engagement. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Taeao, S., & Averill, R. (2020). “Tu’utu’u le upega i le loloto—Cast the net into deeper waters”: Using research and practice to rethink mathematics pedagogy: Let’s dance! Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2020(1). https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0161
Taito-Taaalii Matamua, L. (2015). Renewing Materials: 3D Printing and Distributed Recycling Disrupting Samoa’s Plastic Waste Stream Thesis (M.D.I.). Victoria University of Wellington, 2015.
Taraban, R., Box, C., Myers, R., Pollard, R., & Bowen, C. W. (2007). Effects of active-learning experiences on achievement, attitudes, and behaviors in high school biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 960–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20183
Tolbert, S., (2015). “Because they want to teach you about their culture”: Analyzing effective mentoring conversations between culturally responsible mentors and secondary science teachers of indigenous students in mainstream schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1325–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21240
Copyright (c) 2023 Margaret Flavell, Cherie Chu-Fuluifaga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.