Bridging Binaries: Navigating Bicultural Space in Film Design
Abstract
This article examines how a researcher (a filmmaker whose lineage is both Indigenous and European) navigates ‘betweenness’ that is sometimes disruptive to cultural conventions. As a gay man who identifies as bicultural, I orient myself with, within and across worlds. From this position my approaches are largely shaped by the Māori values of manaakitanga (caring for the needs of people), kaitiakitanga (protecting and caring for all creation) and whanaungatanga (creating and sustaining relationships). These are supplemented by values emanating from my position as a gay activist and the resulting concerns with social justice and facing down the erasure, marginalization or exoticization of LGBTQ+ identities. Although I am of mixed race ancestry, I see my bicultural positioning as a way of accessing a form of epistemological pluralism that embraces intellectual, physical, social and spiritual ways of knowing. Thus, when creating the feature film Punch (Ings, 2022), it was necessary to find a place to stand, in practice, as a bicultural story designer. This involved actualizing productive care inside how the film production was experienced, working in communion with the land as a living being, and navigating tensions of transgression by establishing facilities for cultural guidance and insight within the project.
References
Ahenakew, C. (2016). Grafting Indigenous ways of knowing onto non-Indigenous ways of being: The (underestimated) challenges of a decolonial imagination. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 323–340.
Andreotti, V., Ahenakew, C., & Cooper, G. (2011). Epistemological pluralism: Ethical and pedagogical challenges in higher education. Alternative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 7(1), 40–50.
Child, I. L. (1970). A psychological study of second-generation in conflict. Russell & Russell. (Original work published 1943).
Clark, J. (2002). Cultural sensitivity and educational research. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 93-100.
Coates, K., & McHugh, P.G. (1998). Living relationships – kokiri ngatahi: the Treaty of Waitangi in the new millennium. Victoria University Press.
Coetzee, W. J., & Liu, X. (2019). Understanding peripheral queer events: The case of gay ski week, Queenstown, New Zealand. In Marginalisation and Events (pp. 159-178). Routledge.
Cuthbertson, P. & Agee M. (2007). What’s so ‘Identity’ about that word?” Pasifika men’s experience of being ‘Afakasi. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 27(2), 77-95.
Dewsbury, J. D., & Cloke, P. (2009). Spiritual landscapes: Existence, performance and immanence. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(6), 695-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903068118
Durie, M. (1998). Te mana, te kawanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination. Oxford University Press.
Freire, P., & Ramos, M. B. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
Furness, J., Nikora, L. W., Hodgetts, D., & Robertson, N. (2016). Beyond ethics to morality: Choices and relationships in bicultural research settings. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2239
Gall, T., Malette, J., & Guirguis-Younger, M. (2011). Spirituality and religiousness: A diversity of definitions. Journal of Spirituality and Mental Health, 13, 158-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2011.593404
Glaser, D. (1958). Dynamics of ethnic identification. American Sociological Review, 23, 31–40.
Hulme, K. (1981). ‘Mauri: An Introduction to Bicultural Poetry in New Zealand.’ In G. Amirthanayagam and S.C. Harrax Eds.), Only Connect: Literary Perspectives East and West, (pp. 290–310). Adelaide: Centre for Research in the New Literatures in English.
Ichheiser, G. (1949). Misunderstandings in human relations: A study of false social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 1–69.
Ings, W. (Writer, designer director). (2022). Punch. [Feature film]. Blue Skin Films/Robin Murphy Productions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoM2SpK8BK8
Ludwig, D. (2016). Overlapping ontologies and Indigenous knowledge. From integration to ontological self-determination. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 59, 36–45.
Marino, F. (2020). Māori gender non-conforming identity: Analysing the ‘Takatāpui’ discourse. Multimodal Communication, 9(1), 20190010. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2019-0010
Meredith. P. (2001). A Half-Caste on the Half-Caste in the Cultural Politics of New Zealand. (pp. 1-23).
https://lianz.waikato.ac.nz/PAPERS/paul/Paul%20Meredith%20Mana%20Verlag%20Paper.pdf
Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F. S., III, & Redman, C. L. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology & Society, 13, 46.
Nairn, R. (2007). Ethical principles and cultural justice in psychological practice. In I. M. Evans, J. J. Rucklidge, & M. O’Driscoll (Eds.), Professional practice of psychology in Aotearoa New Zealand. The New Zealand Psychological Society.
Nikora, L. W., Te Awekotuku, N., & Tamanui, V. (2013). Home and the spirit in the Māori world. Paper presented at the He Manawa Whenua Indigenous Research Conference, 30 June–3 July 2013. Hamilton, New Zealand.
Okri, B. (1997). A way of being free: The joys of storytelling III. Phoenix House.
Openshaw, R., & D. McKenzie (1997). (Eds.), Reinterpreting the educational past. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Pearson, D. (1991). Biculturalism and multiculturalism in comparative perspective. In P. Spoonley, D. Pearson & C. Macpherson (Eds.), Nga Take: Ethnic relations and racism in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 194-214). Dunmore Press.
Pearson, D. (1996). Multiculturalism and biculturalism: The recent New Zealand experience in comparative perspective. Journal of intercultural studies, 17, 29-40.
Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. (1936). Memorandum on the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149–152.
Richards, Jack C. (1991). Longman dictionary of the English language (2nd ed.). Longman.
Rudmin, F. W. (2003). Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 3–37.
Somerville, A. T. (2002). Waharoa: Māori-Pākehā writing in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In Jonathan Brennan (Ed.), Mixed race literature (pp. 200–223). Stanford University Press.
Stake, R. (1998). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative
inquiry (pp. 86-109). Sage.
Tīwhanawhana Trust (2017). Takatāpui – A resource hub. https:// takatapui.nz/definition-of-takatapui#takatapui-meaning
Treharne, G. J., & Adams, J. (2017). Critical perspectives on the diversity of research into sexualities and health in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Thinking outside the boxes. Psychology of Sexualities Review, 8(1), 53–70.
Tulloch, S. (Ed.). (1995). Oxford dictionary and thesaurus (2nd ed.). Oxford
University Press.
Walker, R. (1973). Biculturalism and education. In D. Bray & C. Hill (Eds.), Polynesian and
Pākehā in New Zealand education (pp. 110-122). Heinemann.
Walker, R. J. (1990). Struggle without end - Ka whawhai tonu matou. Penguin Books.
Walker, R. J. (1996). Nga pepa a Ranginui - The Walker Papers. Penguin Books.
Youth2000. (2020). A Youth19 Brief: Same- and-multiple-sex attracted students (Youth2000, p. 6) [Youth Wellbeing Report]. University of Auckland, Victoria University, University of Otago, Auckland University of Technology.
Copyright (c) 2023 Welby Ings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. By publishing in LINK PRAXIS Journal, the author(s) agree to the dissemination of their work through the LINK PRAXIS Journal.
By publishing in LINK PRAXIS Journal, the authors grant the Journal a Creative Commons nonexclusive worldwide license (CC-BY 4.0): Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License) for electronic dissemination of the article via the Internet, and, a nonexclusive right
to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit, and distribute the content of the journal. The authors grant the Journal the right to transfer content (without changing it), to any medium or format necessary for the purpose of preservation.
Authors agree that the Journal will not be liable for any damages, costs, or losses whatsoever arising in any circumstances from its services, including damages arising from the breakdown of technology and difficulties with access.