The Influence of the Infomercial in New Zealand
Abstract
New Zealand television networks introduced infomercials (30 minute advertisements designed to appear as if they are programmes) in late 1993. Although infomercials date from the 1950s in the USA, they were unknown in this country and quickly came to be seen as a peculiarly “intense” form of hyper-commercial broadcasting. This article aims to sketch out the cultural importance of the infomercial by analysing historical published primary sources (from the specialist and general press) as they reflect the views and opinions that resulted from the introduction of the infomercial. Specifically, it outlines the three main areas where that cultural importance was located. It concludes by analysing the significance of the cultural impact of the infomercial, both within broadcasting and within wider society.
References
AdMedia. “The best and worst ads of 1995,” December, 1995: 24.
AdMedia. “A decade of Fair Go’s best & worst,” January, 2002: 46.
Bain, Helen. “But wait there’s more …” The Dominion, April 14, 2001: 19.
Bell, Avril. “An Endangered Species: local programming in the New Zealand television market,” Media, Culture and Society, 17(2), 1995: 181-200.
Body, Guy. “The Week” (cartoon), New Zealand Herald, February 18, 2006: A22.
Clausen, Victoria “US lawyers look at Taebo copies,” The Press, August 9, 1999: 2.
Cleave, Louisa. “Fitness objectives key to exercising,” Sunday News, January 26, 1997: 28.
Davis, Rachel. “Last Line,” AdMedia (Fastline), July, 2003: 4.
Deveraux, Michelle. “Pills no substitute for fruit and veges,” Sunday Star Times, January 11, 1998: A4.
Fallow, Michael. “God’s infomercial?,” The Southland Times, January 9, 1998: 19.
Horrocks, R. The History of New Zealand Television: “An Expensive Medium for a Small Country”. in R. Horrocks & N. Perry (eds.) Television in New Zealand: Programming the Nation, pp. 29-41. Australia: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Houlahan, Michelle. “Infomercial Hour horror,” The Evening Post, January 16, 1995: 15.
Janes, Alan. “Banksie’s bee’s sting stung,” The Independent, July 18, 2001: 4.
Little, Paul. “You Said It: Reader’s Poll 1994,” NZ Listener, August 20, 1994: 23.
Management Magazine. ““We Interrupt This Advertising For A Short Programme Break...” December, 1996: 128.
Marketing Magazine (NZ) Fastline. “Saatchi appears to have hit gold with beer commercials,” November 2, 1995: 2.
Mental Health Foundation. “Absolutely Nothing Day 2002” http://www.mentalhealth.org.nz/ page.php?p=89&fp=22&sp=45 [accessed October 23 2005]
New Zealand Herald, “Negotiating TV’s fine line,” January 15, 2003: A13.
Nudd, Karen. “Communicado tackles domestic violence,” AdMedia, March, 1994: 16.
Pepperall, Susan. “But wait, there’s more - party political broadcast,” Waikato Times, September 25, 1996: B1.
Pinker, Karen. “Latest fitness craze provides a kick,” The Nelson Mail, August 11, 1999: 1.
Shortland Street NZFA Accession number 1998.6377.
Sivulka, Juliann. Soap, Sex and Cigarettes. A Cultural History of American Advertising, Wadsworth, Belmont, 1998.
Smith, Paul. “Decade’s damage leaves TV viewers still dreaming,” The National Business Review, May 8, 1998: 41.
Smith, Paul. “No one gets a fair go in TVNZ politics,” The National Business Review, November 21, 1997: 74.
Smith, Paul. “How did they go?,” NZ Listener, March 11, 1995: 94.
The Evening Post. “Do nothing for mental health,” October 2, 2000: 1.
The Evening Post. “Call to take time out,” January 15, 2002: 2.
The National Business Review, “Ad Hoc,” April 5, 2002: 24.
The Press. “Debate signals start of race,” October 28, 1999: 3.
The Press, “Moves called “not new”,” August 10, 1999: 7.
Wichtel, Diana. “TV Review – Here’s to 94,” NZ Listener, December 24, 1994: 94.
Wichtel, Diana. “TV Review – Local Time,” NZ Listener, September 2, 1995: 64.
Wichtel, Diana. “TV Review – But wait, there’s more!,” NZ Listener, March 11, 1995: 64.
Wichtel, Diana. “TV Review – Good For A Laugh,” NZ Listener, December 17, 2005: 70.
Copyright (c) 2019 Rosser Johnson
Article text:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Photos:
Backstory has been granted permission to reproduce photographs and images that are subject to copyright. Permission to reproduce this material must be sought from the copyright holder concerned. Please note, some images may have been removed due to copyright reasons.