Sustaining Trust through Unexpected Disruptions in New Zealand Secondary Schools

  • Jane Coup
  • Kate Thornton

Abstract

Trust is highly valued in schools and has been linked to factors that support innovation, wellbeing and high student achievement (Bryk & Schneider, 2002; Sun et al., 2023; Tschannen-Moran & Gareis, 2015). The purpose of the research study this article is based on was to identify how sustaining trust through unexpected change differs from building trust, and therefore what actions are required from school principals during these disruptions. Data from an anonymous survey of New Zealand secondary school teachers revealed how important they thought different facets of trust were and what advice they would give to principals when building trust versus sustaining trust. It was found that honesty was ranked highest for both. In addition, the most frequent advice to principals centered on acts of benevolence when both building and sustaining trust, followed by openness. Teachers also valued principals remaining calm during uncertainty. Their advice also shifted from building an individual relationship with the principal when establishing trust, towards looking after the team collectively when sustaining trust. The implications of this research are that principals need to be aware of the impact of their actions during unexpected changes, focusing on the wellbeing of all and providing certainty to teachers by taking a consistent, calm, and transparent approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AbuHasan, Q., Reddy, V., & Siddiqui, W. (2023, July 17). Neuroanatomy, Amygdala. National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537102/

Adams, C., & Forsyth, P. (2025). Teacher distrust in the school principal: a mental state distinct from trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 63(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2024-0136

Battaglia, M. (2008). Convenience sampling. In Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vol. 0, pp. 149-149). Sage Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n105

Belasen, A., & Belasen, A. (2024). Signaling trust during disruptions: perceived gender differences in trustworthy leadership traits. Gender in Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-04-2024-0187

Berkovich, I. (2018). Typology of trust relationships: profiles of teachers’ trust in principal and their implications. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 24(7), 749-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1483914

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis : a practical guide. Sage.

Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Relational Trust and Improving Academic Achievement. In Trust in Schools (pp. 91-121). Russell Sage Foundation.

Bukko, D., Liu, K., & Johnson, A. H. (2021). Principal Practices That Build and Sustain Trust: Recommendations from Teachers in a High-Trust School. Planning & Changing, 50(1-2), 58-74.

Chen, C., Saparito, P., & Belkin, L. (2011). Responding to trust breaches: The domain specificity of trust and the role of affect. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.552438

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Surveys, longitudinal, cross-sectional and trend studies. In Research Methods in Education (8th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 334–360). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-17

Edwards-Groves, C., & Grootenboer, P. (2021). Conceptualising five dimensions of relational trust: implications for middle leadership. School Leadership & Management, 41(3), 260-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1915761

Gill, H., Vreeker-Williamson, E., Hing, L. S., Cassidy, S. A., & Boies, K. (2024). Effects of Cognition-based and Affect-based Trust Attitudes on Trust Intentions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(6), 1355-1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09986-z

Gustafsson, S., Gillespie, N., Searle, R., Hailey, V., & Dietz, G. (2021). Preserving Organizational Trust During Disruption. Organization Studies, 42(9), 1409-1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620912705

Hallam, P., Boren, D., Hite, J., Hite, S., & Mugimu, B. (2013). Headteacher visibility and teacher perceptions of headteacher trustworthiness: A comparison of the Ugandan context to existing theory. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.08.003

Hathaway, W., & Newton, B. (2023, May 29). Neuroanatomy, Prefrontal Cortex. National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499919/

Hungerford, C., & Cleary, M. (2021). “High Trust” and “Low Trust” Workplace Settings: Implications for Our Mental Health and Wellbeing. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 42(5), 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1822480

Kähkönen, T. (2021). Repairing trust within teams after organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(5), 957-968. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2020-0348

Kähkönen, T., Blomqvist, K., Gillespie, N., & Vanhala, M. (2021). Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 130, 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.019

Kasten, L. (2018). Trustful behaviour is meaningful behaviour: Implications for theory on identification-based trusting relations. Journal of Trust Research, 8(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1479967

Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792

Mohapatra, A. N., & Wagner, S. (2023). The role of the prefrontal cortex in social interactions of animal models and the implications for autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1205199

Panteli, N., Nurse, J., Collins, E., & Williams, N. (2023). Trust disruption and preservation in the Covid-19 work from home context. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(3), 306-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-02-2022-0017

Soderberg, A., & Romney, A. (2022). Building trust: How leaders can engender feelings of trust among followers. Business Horizons, 65(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.031

Sun, J., Zhang, R., & Forsyth, P. (2023). The Effects of Teacher Trust on Student Learning and the Malleability of Teacher Trust to School Leadership: A 35-Year Meta-Analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(4), 744-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X231183662

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. Societies, 5(2), 256-276. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020256

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547

Wylie, C., & McKinley, S. (2018). Educational Leadership Capability Framework. Education Council. https://storage.googleapis.com/website-search-pdfs-bucket/Leadership%20Capability%20Framework.pdf

Zak, P. J. (2017, January-February). The neuroscience of trust. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 84-90.

Zak, P. J. (2018). The neuroscience of high-trust organizations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 70(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000076

Published
2026-06-30
How to Cite
Coup, J., & Thornton, K. (2026). Sustaining Trust through Unexpected Disruptions in New Zealand Secondary Schools . New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 23(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v23i1.705
Section
Articles