Reframing Teacher Appraisal as Professional Growth: A Qualitative Study of Practice and Perception in New Zealand Schools
Abstract
Teacher appraisal systems in New Zealand have historically emphasised accountability, often at the expense of professional development. This study examines how appraisal processes in two primary schools integrate accountability with developmental goals to support teacher growth. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participant observations, and document analysis. Thematic analysis revealed that a deeply embedded culture of learning—driven by transformational, pedagogical, and distributive leadership—was central to this integration. School leaders fostered pedagogical improvement through reflective practices, feedback, dialogue, and collaborative inquiry. Mentorship and teaching portfolios emerged as key mechanisms, enabling continuous professional growth and self-assessment while reinforcing accountability. Findings indicate that appraisal systems grounded in collaborative learning, intentional leadership, and reflective practice can move beyond compliance to become powerful tools for teacher development. The study contributes to appraisal reform discourse by demonstrating how schools can reframe accountability as a developmental opportunity, providing practical insights for policymakers, school leaders, and educators seeking to balance evaluation with professional growth.
Downloads
References
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2018). Australian professional standards for teachers. https://www.aitsl.edu.au
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Sage.
Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2009). Te Kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 734–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.009
Bolger, D., & Vail, H. (2003, May). Perspectives on “Supporting Teacher Excellence”: The Ontario teacher performance appraisal system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Halifax, NS, Canada
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Cardno, C., Bassett, M., & Wood, C. (2016). Teaching as inquiry in an appraisal context. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0047
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017).
Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/productfiles/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011
Education Council of Aotearoa New Zealand. (2016). A teacher's voice: What is evidence? https://celebratingnorthlandstamariki.co.nz/images/2016/Appraisal-of-Teachers-What-is-Evidence.pdf
Education Review Office. (2016). Appraisal as a catalyst for improved learner outcomes: One year on-December 2016. https://www.apis.org.nz/recent-publications-from-ero/
Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher performance appraisal: More about performance or development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.6
Isoré, M. (2009). Teacher Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 23. OECD Publishing
Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2017). Revisiting the widget effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17718797
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
Maharaj, S. (2017). Administrators’ views on teacher evaluation: Examining Ontario’s teacher performance appraisal. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (152), 1–22. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjeap/article/view/42859
Manners, E. (2021). Performance Appraisal: Lessons Learned from Ontario Teacher Evaluations, Queen's Industrial Relations Centre. Canada. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/xx2n1s
Mbabazi, A., Muhammad, T., Bagiwa, Z. L., & Aja, L. (2025). Enhancing teacher performance and motivation through effective appraisal policies: Evidence-based recommendations for improving educational outcomes in secondary schools in Uganda. F1000Research, 14, 826. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.168834.1
McChesney, K., Gurney, L., & Chivers, M. (2024). Teacher professional learning and development research in Aotearoa New Zealand: A scoping review of literature, 2010–2023. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-024-00335-5
OECD. (2013a). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190658-en
OECD. (2013b). Teachers’ professional development: Europe in international comparison. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 results. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). Enhancing teacher appraisal for professional growth (OECD Education Working Papers No. 278). OECD Publishing.
Perryman, J. (2022). Teacher retention in an age of performative accountability: Target culture and the discourse of disappointment. Routledge.
Smyle, R. A. (2022). Professional Learning Groups: Is it possible to reimagine appraisal culture? New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 19(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v19i1.307
Talmor, R., Reingold, R., Spiegel, A., & Greenberg, E. (2020). Promoting professional growth in new teacher evaluation systems: Practitioners’ lived experiences in changing policy contexts. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100873
Teaching Council of Aotearoa New Zealand. (2021). Professional growth cycle. https://teachingcouncil.nz/en/grow-my-practice/professional-growth/professional-growth-cycle
Timperley, H. S., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Williams, P. (2019). Current and ideal performance appraisal: Employee perceptions in an Australian faith-based education system. TEACH Journal of Christian Education, 13(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.55254/1835-1492.1414
Copyright (c) 2026 Marianne Simon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.