Stakeholders’ perceptions and behavioural intentions toward online CSR communication: An attribution theory approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24135/pmm.v1i2.30

Keywords:

attribution theory, corporate social responsibility, CSR communication, digital media, online media, perceptions, stakeholders

Abstract

The present research applies attribution theory to provide holistic insights into the antecedents and consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) attribution on stakeholders’ perceptions and behavioral intentions toward online CSR communication in the digital era. A systematic review and a meta-synthesis of relevant empirical journal articles on the Scopus database have been conducted. This synthesis of recent findings reveals that it is vital for organisations to invoke intrinsic CSR attributions at every touchpoint of online CSR communication since extrinsic CSR attributions that are formed in the absence of intrinsic CSR attributions negatively result in skepticism and mistrust. Concurrently, intrinsic CSR attributions lead to positive attitudes, perceptions, trust, purchase intentions, and electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) intentions toward online CSR communication messages and organisations. To effectively foster intrinsic CSR attributions, organisations need to acknowledge and implement the antecedents of intrinsic CSR attributions, which include communications of appropriate social causes and message design. Effective message designs that influence stakeholders to form intrinsic CSR attributions include information specificity, social topic awareness, perceived interactivity, negative arousing visuals of the current problems that stakeholders face in the social causes, evidence-based CSR messages for stakeholders with dispositional attribution styles, and belief-based CSR messages for audiences with situational attribution styles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Chanapa Itdhiamornkulchai, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

Chanapa Itdhiamornkulchai is a lecturer at the General Education Center, Chulalongkorn University, and the Language Institute Thammasat University, Thailand. She is a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Communication Arts, Chulalongkorn University. Her research interests include sustainability communication, CSR communication, strategic communication, green marketing communications, digital marketing, and social media.

Duang-Kamol Chartprasert, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

Dr Duang-Kamol Chartprasert is a retired assistant professor from the Department of Journalism and Information Studies, Faculty of Communication Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. Her research interests include journalism, psychology, and social media.

References

Andreu, L., Casado-Díaz, A. B., & Mattila, A. S. (2015). Effects of message appeal and service type in CSR communication strategies. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1488-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.039

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2014). Social Psychology (8th ed., international ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Chung, S., & Lee, S. Y. (2017). Visual CSR messages and the effects of emotional valence and arousal on perceived CSR motives, attitude, and behavioral intentions. Communication Research, 46(7), 926-947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216689161

Dunn, K., & Harness, D. (2018). Communicating corporate social responsibility in a social world: The effects of company-generated and user-generated social media content on CSR attributions and scepticism. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(17-18), 1503-1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1536675

Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284976

Ginder, W., Kwon, W.-S., & Byun, S.-E. (2019). Effects of internal–external congruence-based CSR positioning: An attribution theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04282-w

Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225

Lee, Y.-J., O’Donnell, N. H., & Hust, S. J. T. (2019). Interaction effects of system-generated information and consumer skepticism: An evaluation of issue support behavior in CSR Twitter campaigns. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1507853

Lim, R. E., Sung, Y. H., & Lee, W.-N. (2018). Connecting with global consumers through corporate social responsibility initiatives: A cross-cultural investigation of congruence effects of attribution and communication styles. Journal of Business Research, 88, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.002

Mercadé-Melé, P., Molinillo, S., Fernández-Morales, A., & Porcu, L. (2018). CSR activities and consumer loyalty: The effect of the type of publicizing medium. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(3), 431-455. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2018.5203

Mizerski, R. W., Golden, L. L., & Kerman, J. B. (1979). The attribution process in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208756

Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2018). Reviewing corporate social responsibility communication: A legitimacy perspective. Corporate Communications, 23(4), 492-511. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/ccij-04-2018-0042

Parcha, J. M. (2017). How much should a corporation communicate about corporate social responsibility? Reputation and amount of information effects on stakeholders’ CSR-induced attributions. Communication Research Reports, 34(3), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1334639

Pérez, A., García de los Salmones, M. d. M., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2020). Effects of the type of CSR discourse for utilitarian and hedonic services. Sustainability, 12(12), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124821

Pérez, A., García de los Salmones, M. d. M., & Liu, M. T. (2020). Information specificity, social topic awareness and message authenticity in CSR communication. Journal of Communication Management, 24(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0097

Sukjaroen, N., & Yoonisil, W. (2014). Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. RMU.J.(Humanities and Social Sciences), 8(3), 43-56.

Solomon, M. R. (2015). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being. (11th ed., Global ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News Framing Theory and Research. In: J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (3rd ed.) (pp. 17-33). Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Tuan, A., Dalli, D., Gandolfo, A., & Gravina, A. (2019). Theories and methods in CSRC research: A systematic literature review. Corporate Communications, 24(2), 212-231. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/ccij-11-2017-0112

van Prooijen, A.-M., & Bartels, J. (2019). Anthropomorphizing brands: The role of attributed brand traits in interactive CSR communication and consumer online endorsements. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(6), 474-483. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1786

West, R., & Turner, L. (2017). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application. McGraw-Hill Education.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Itdhiamornkulchai, C., & Chartprasert, D.-K. (2025). Stakeholders’ perceptions and behavioural intentions toward online CSR communication: An attribution theory approach. Pacific Media Monographs, 1(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.24135/pmm.v1i2.30