Stealing nothing

Cause and effect of theft

  • Lucy Holmes

Abstract

What can psychoanalysis contribute to an understanding of the criminal act of shoptheft? While the focus of social science research is the prevention of shoptheft in order to minimize its effects upon the economy — and thus its concern is with the object not the subject of the crime — by comparison, psychoanalysis is concerned with the effect a criminal act has for the subject who commits the crime. According to Lacan, psychoanalysis does not dehumanize the criminal and instead emphasizes the role that theft has in the problematic human relationship to pleasure and satisfaction. By comparing post-Freudian theories of theft with a Lacanian approach, this paper discusses how the drives and desire are of relevance to the subjectivization of theft.

Author Biography

Lucy Holmes

As recorded in 2007.

Dr. Lucy Holmes is a lecturer at Elam School of Fine Arts at the University of Auckland, a psychoanalytic-psychotherapist with a clinical practice, and an analyst-in-training with the Centre for Lacanian Analysis. Her research is in the fields of psychoanalysis and the visual arts. She is an associate editor of the Journal for Lacanian Studies and a member of the Centre for Lacanian Analysis (www.lacan.org.nz).

Published
2007-09-30
How to Cite
Holmes, L. (2007). Stealing nothing: Cause and effect of theft. Ata: Journal of Psychotherapy Aotearoa New Zealand, 13(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.9791/ajpanz.2007.05